Real-Time Transparency
CIOs need a comprehensive, automated way to account for all IT assets in the organization — and in real time.
By Lane F. Cooper
Managing business-unit demand for IT services has never been easy.
But it has become more complicated than ever as workers become
more mobile, and the once-hard boundaries that delineated an
enterprise network grow fuzzy. Today's road warriors, for instance,
regularly access the enterprise network using multiple devices
from numerous access points, both within and outside of the firewall.
Similarly, new collaboration-based business strategies with both customers and
suppliers require IT administrators to make enterprise computing resources available
to a growing number of nonemployees.
What's needed is a solution that can
track all elements of the IT environment,
starting from the moment a procurement
request is submitted, right through to the
time that asset is retired. "CIOs need to
develop and implement the appropriate
rules and policies for managing assets in
increasingly dynamic environments," says
Robert Stroud, IT service management
and IT governance evangelist for CA. "In
short, they need a strategy to automate
almost all aspects of every asset's life cycle."
IT asset management, or ITAM for
short, calls for developing a comprehensive
and automated way to account for all IT
assets in an organization, and in as close to
a real-time manner as possible. ITAM also
helps form the basis for understanding the
cost of delivering IT services to an organization's
business units. Finally, ITAM connects
the dots between what assets IT
owns, how those assets are used, and how
the costs are accounted for.
ITAM can help organizations in three
important ways:
1. By providing a clear window into
what IT assets (hardware, software, network
services) are currently attached to the
enterprise computing environment;
2. By delivering an accurate awareness
of how different business processes are
making use of those assets — including IT
human resources needed to provide services,
fix problems and maintain optimum
levels of efficiency;
3. By laying the foundation for managing
the IT organization to deliver measurable
business benefits to the organization,
rather than as an overhead activity measured
by its ability to meet technical
performance metrics, such as uptime, speed
and storage capacity.
"For us, demand management around
our assets represents an
understanding of what our
financial-services clients are
looking for," says Paul
Hypki, risk management
officer, Transaction Services,
Thomson Financial, a leading
provider of information,
news and technology solutions.
"At Thomson, we've
implemented an ITAM
strategy to improve operations, so that
when our customers initiate a request for
change, we evaluate, prioritize and price.
Then we schedule that work based on our
demand management philosophy. This
helps us to work on the right priorities at
the right time."
IT asset management solutions enable
a CIO to proactively manage an entire IT
asset base through automated discovery,
configuration management, software usage
monitoring and cross-platform reporting. By
implementing asset management solutions,
CIOs can also gain other significant
capabilities, such as comprehensive change
management and sophisticated asset billing
and charge-back functionality.
The need for asset management is real.
In a recent survey conducted by U.K.-based consultants Centrix Network Ltd.,
when IT decision makers at companies
with more than 1,000 employees were asked
if they had full visibility into their IT assets,
more than 60 percent answered "no."
What's more, nearly a third of the respondents
in the Centrix survey admitted they
did not know the total number of software
licenses their organization owned. Centrix
also discovered that the asset-management
problem is most acute at larger companies.
Nearly 65 percent of respondents at companies
with more than 3,000 employees
admitted to having only a limited understanding
of the disposition of their software
assets, compared with less than 55 percent
at companies with fewer than 3,000 employees
(see chart below).
What this means is that CIOs will find
it difficult to assess the true costs associated
with maintaining their IT operations.
More important, CIOs will find it virtually
impossible to understand the costs associated
with providing IT support to specific
business processes. The possible result:
Some IT assets could be misused; for example,
when software is not in compliance
with license agreements. Without an accurate
control mechanism, a CIO's software
audits may expose the organization to
both legal and financial risks that stem
from possibly unintentional, but still illegal,
use of software.
Other assets — including storage, server
and desktop applications — may be underutilized
without a good asset management
strategy, too. In fact, these assets could be
so far "off the radar" that a CIO would
acquire unnecessary software licenses
because other IT executives are unaware
that currently unused licenses have already
been purchased. The same can happen
with hardware assets for storage, server
and desktop applications.
Better IT Delivery
Asset management can help. CIOs who
implement asset management solutions
can accurately report on the disposition of
their many hardware investments, software
licenses and related IT services.
Asset management can also help CIOs
deliver IT services to the organization's
business units and other internal customers.
For many CIOs, the lack of a single system
that lets them understand the costs, benefits
and trade-offs among IT services makes
it difficult for them to engage the business
in fact-based dialogue. Lacking the ability
to relate services delivered to business customers
in business terms, CIOs will continue
to face a credibility and communication gap
with internal customers. Asset management
can help by equipping
CIOs with the data needed
to explain IT budgets and
resource allocations to internal
customers. This, in turn,
can help CIOs engage with
their internal customers
using terms relevant to the
business, ultimately leading
to greater credibility in the
organization for CIOs.
The strategic implications
of asset management can be significant,
too. For example, among companies
that are growing through mergers and
acquisitions, CIOs and other executives
must track how existing assets are managed,
even as the entire array of new
assets is introduced and integrated into the
merged organization. More important, as
the merged organization begins to rework
business processes to gain the full benefits
of joint operations, executives need to
understand what technology to keep, what
to throw away and how to work with the
skill sets of the integrated IT staffs.
From an organic-growth standpoint,
asset management can help to improve a
company's time-to-market strategy. "You
have to know where your assets are currently
deployed, what projects those assets
are associated with, and what the forecast
for new capabilities is going to be as certain
projects go to completion and new projects
fire up," says John Plucinski, director of
technical sales at CA. "All of this analysis
requires extensive coordination of hardware,
software and people assets."
Another role for asset management: supporting
the IT department's move from a
cost center to a business unit that delivers
tangible financial contributions to the enterprise.
"We're seeing a lot of the IT
organizations among our clients
move to demand management
models so that they can exercise
foresight and be more proactive in
the IT resource planning process,"
says Kelly McMahon, senior technical
services manager for CA's
Global Assessment Team.
These CIOs no longer need to wait for
business units to approach the IT organization
with a list of new requirements they
would like to see implemented over the next
fiscal year. Instead, they can participate in
the strategic-planning process. They can
also accurately explain to business decision
makers which IT resources are available,
which can be made available soon, and
which can be put into the application
development pipeline for the long haul.
Inform Colleagues
In effect, CIOs can use the intelligence they
glean from their asset management strategy
to inform other, non-IT colleagues of
the full range of opportunities that can be
exploited in different operational scenarios.
For example, a human resources officer
could be made aware of Web-based
services that the organization might offer
to employees for self-service applications
dealing with payroll, benefits and other HR
information and services.
But such changes can themselves be a
challenge. Many organizations change business
practices and technology management
techniques, but that doesn't mean
such changes are greeted with excitement.
Business people often like things to stay the
way they are, even if "the way they are" is
no longer efficient. This can also be the case
when executives are confronted with implementing
an asset management strategy.
"Perceived complexity is a barrier to developing
and deploying comprehensive
demand management initiatives," says
Stroud of CA. "Some people are intimidated
by the complexity. And indeed,
automating the process can be a tremendously
complex process without the right
technology."
Asset management is inherently a multidisciplinary,
interdepartmental activity. In
other words, it involves non-IT skill sets
and non-IT managers and departments.
This may be troubling for
any organization that allows its business
units to operate in isolated silos. At these
companies, the management team tasked
with implementing asset management must
first learn to speak the languages of businessunit
leaders, application developers and
hardware people.
At companies that implement asset management
processes, CIOs can gain many
advantages, including greater proactivity
in planning and supporting the needs of the
business. For example, a CIO with an asset
management strategy in place can help
manage storage assets, reducing both cost
and risk without sacrificing performance.
"Most of your large companies have some
type of storage management system that is
typically expensive to purchase," says
McMahon of CA. "When you start putting
the processes in place on the front end for
capacity management and put some foresight
into when you're going to need that demand,
you can budget better, allocate dollars more
efficiently and be better prepared to support
the demand management model."
Also, CIOs who are expected to field
highly available, highly reliable IT systems
will find asset management a boon.
According to McMahon, companies that
implement asset management also report
fewer emergency blackouts and outages
than those who don't.
Life-Cycle Planning
Another reason to implement asset management:
The ability to engage in effective
full-life-cycle planning. "Most organizations
will let an asset live on and on and
on, even though it's fully depreciated,"
says Stroud of CA. "They do not understand
the full cost that its ongoing use may
have on the organization." That said, IT
shops that implement an asset management
strategy may need to rethink their maintenance
contracts in terms of what's available
today and whether anyone is even
using a particular asset anymore.
With more organizations focusing on
how all business processes can be better supported
by the IT infrastructure and architecture,
asset management will become an
increasingly important initiative. By using
asset management best practices, IT managers
can better understand the concerns
of the business, financial, technical and
legal disciplines within their organizations.
An asset management strategy can also
provide IT executives with an accurate,
ongoing window into the technologies
being deployed in their organizations. It also
provides a view of the financial impacts — both costs and benefits — that these assets
have on business processes. Finally, an
asset management strategy can also list
both the short- and long-term changes
the organization must make to secure a differentiating
advantage and remain competitive.
For CIOs struggling to track their
IT inventory, asset management is the
solution.
Lane F. Cooper is an editor and analyst covering the impact
of technology on business operations. He has written for InformationWeek, Optimize, Enterprise Systems Journal and
other publications.